Large firms to the national diamond and to competitive industrial
How important are large firms to the national diamond and to competitive industrial clusters, and how good are these firms and their management?
Previously, Japan has had a strong supplier system, labor costs, extremely demanding clients, which allowed it to obtain competitive advantage than other countries. Nonetheless, Porter (1990) in assessing competitive advantage overlooks the importance of history, late development models, managerial enterprise, and globalisation. Therefore, he inadequately defines the issue and offers deficient solutions (Johnson &Turner 2015).
This demonstrates that there is the need for other strategies to define different business structures and comparative economic productivity of countries. For instance, Gerschenkron (1962) model that concentrates on late industrialisation can be a technique for explaining a country’s economic performance (Mowery 1999). The model indicates that Japan transitioned from rapid development in the 1951-90, which was essential to totally globalise.
How important are large firms to the national diamond and to competitive industrial clusters, and how good are these firms and their management?
The economy of Japan increased following the decline of United States in the 70s, an era Japanese firms replaced American main sectors. Production as well as management of operations allowed the Japanese organisations to make Japan competitive. This was realised through production structures and making products at low costs. Conversely, they offered quality goods to consumers at low costs. In the 60s, US firm’s productivity was at 2.7% and 20 years later reduced to -0.30%.
Bibliography
Abe, E. and Fitzgerald, R., 1995. Japanese economic success: timing, culture, and organisational capability. Business History, 37(2), pp.1-31.
Best, M., 2001. The new competitive advantage: the renewal of American industry. OUP Catalogue.
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Van Marrewijk, C. and Van Witteloostuijn, A., 2006. Nations and firms in the global economy.
Chandler, A. 1995, ‘Managerial Enterprise and Corporate Capabilities’, in G Jones and C Harvey, eds, Organizational Capability and Competitive Advantage
Chandler, A., Hagstrom, P. and Solvell, O., 1999. The dynamic firm: the role of technology, strategy, organization, and regions. Oxford University Press.
Dicken, P., 2003. Global shift: Reshaping the global economic map in the 21st century. Sage.
Fruin, W M 1994. ‘History and Logic of Interdependence’, in The Japanese Enterprise System ,ch.1
Hannah, L., 1991. Scale and scope: towards a European visible hand?. Business History, 33(2), pp.297-309.
Hikino, T. and Amsden, A.H., 1994. Staying behind, stumbling back, sneaking up, soaring ahead: late industrialization in historical perspective. Convergence of productivity: Cross- national studies and historical evidence, pp.285-315.
Hutton, W., 2011. The State We’re In:(Revised Edition). Random House.
Johnson, D. and Turner, C., 2015. European business. Routledge.
Lane, C. and Probert, J., 2009. National capitalisms, global production networks: Fashioning the value chain in the UK, US, and Germany. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Lawrence, P. and Braddon, D. eds., 1999. Strategic issues in European aerospace. Ashgate Pub Limited.
Lewis, M., Fitzgerald, R. and Harvey, C., 1996. The Growth of nations: Culture, competitiveness, and the problem of globalization. Bristol Academic Press.
Madar, D., 2010. Big Steel: technology, trade, and survival in a global market. UBC Press.
Mowery, D.C., 1999. Sources of industrial leadership: studies of seven industries. Cambridge University Press.
Porter, M. E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Fourth Edition, London, MacMillan Press.
Porter, M.E., 1990. The competitive advantage of notions. Harvard business review, 68(2), pp.73-93.
Schmitz, C.J., 1995. The growth of big business in the United States and Western Europe, 1850- 1939 (Vol. 23). Cambridge University Press.
Vogel, S.K., 2006. Japan remodeled: How government and industry are reforming Japanese capitalism (Vol. 224). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Whittington, R., Mayer, M. and Curto, F., 1999. Chandlerism in post-war Europe: strategic and structural change in France, Germany and the UK, 1950-1993. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(3), pp.519-551.
Witt, M.A., 2008. Crossvergence 10 years on: Impact and further potential. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(1), pp.47-52.
Yamamura, K. and Streeck, W. eds., 2003. The end of diversity?: prospects for German and Japanese capitalism. Cornell University Press.