Fallacious notions about contemporary and moral conventional thought

Order 100% plagiarism free essay now

It is not proper to distinguish modern and traditional thought from a chronological perspective. A number of modern thinkers use conventional justifications. Implicitly, convention thought is not outdated because quite a number of modern views attained cultural supremacy in the seventeenth century (Kaplan 136). In this case, even though it appears that there have been changes in last ten decades, there are not due to different ethical thoughts. These changes simply help contemporary ethics to a valid conclusion.

Fallacious notions about contemporary and moral conventional thought

Order 100% plagiarism free essay now

Furthermore, it is wrong to differentiate conventional and contemporary ethics based on reasoning or emotions. Traditional thought is guided byemotional reaction to the environment, which is commonly called passion by ancient writers (Bandura 73). Nonetheless, these emotions are developed by reasons. For the ancient, the goal of morality was to form passions to help people correctly react to objects. On the other hand, contemporary ethics simply take emotions for granted and since emotions cannot be altered, they hinder moral actions. For that reason, use emotions and reasons to isolated modern and traditional ethical thinkingis inaccurate.

Fallacious notions about contemporary and moral conventional thought

Order 100% plagiarism free essay now

Similarly, many believe that contemporary thought is gray while rational ethics is white and black. Contemporary thought relies on universal standards of ethical practices and seems inflexible. Traditional thoughtview human habits based on the virtue. This is attributed to the fact that people have to makedecision about different things; hence there is flexibility with regards to assessing practices. For instance, contemporary ethics depicts that the lying is immoral. However, in traditional ethics there is a margin that allows assessment of various goods, possibly there might be truth in lying. This flexibility is not validating in modern thought but justifiable in conventional thought (Kaplan 136).