Traditional morality and contemporary ethics

Order 100% Plagiarism Free Essay Now

While both the conventional and the contemporary moral thought should fulfill two principles, mainly validation and applicability, nonetheless, a myriad of conventional moral concepts are not able to attain the second category. Again, they also fall short of the enormous demands of applied morality to solve the intricate ethical anomalies of modern times. The dilemma that conventional moral thought facesis the inability to deal with new anomalies brought about by the advancements of science such as nuclear power, genetic re-engineeringand cloning (Kaplan 139). Consequently, the moral dilemma paused by modern thought is that although scientific devices provide us with raw power, it is incumbent upon us to not only determine prudent ways of using that power but also proscribing wrong ways.

Traditional morality and contemporary ethics

Order 100% Plagiarism Free Essay Now

Consequently, an intriguing notion is where science is seen to be morally neutral, and yet this neutrality aphorism is largely embraced by scientists as an emblem of honor, projecting themselves as impartial servants of truth that simply provide society with facts and tools. Fundamentally, though scientific evolution has given rise to devices that canused for good, they also work against the moral good if they land in wrong hands. In this case,contemporary moral law cannottherefore ascertain what should be. This frame of thought seems perfectly rational from the wordgo since the universe in its benign indifference, is what it is irrespective of what people may think is right, and would not seem to take sides in moral differences (Pinker 66).. Moreover, this proposition indicates that while science employs information of the natural world to empower humanity, it is faced withdilemma when it comes to what humanity does with the scientific advancements.

Traditional morality and contemporary ethics

Order 100% Plagiarism Free Essay Now

The neutrality of science is another dilemma that both conventional and contemporary thinkers grapple with. At that point, the age of technological innovation has shown us to be cautious of the dangers of certain scientific inventions such as tools of influence, dilapidation or destruction (Pinker 65). People now understand that some of the most useful technologies can create an avenue of troubling moral questions. Fundamentally, these moral questions are slated to evolve more complex and disturbing in future as biology becomes progressively a science of production. Subsequently, the moral dilemma of modern science goes far beyond the uncertainty of new technologies since modern science is more than a source of technology, where scientists are often more than mere detectives and toolmakers. Ultimately contemporary science is the grandest human endeavor whose way of thinking controls how mankind comprehends itself and its place (Pinker 70).