Assessment Task Three. Critical Reflective Piece.
Assessment Task Three. Critical Reflective Piece.
Reflecting on the possible strengths and weaknesses of the deprivation of liberty safeguards, relating them and making specific reference to relevant experience from your own workplace
Write up to 1500 words (maximum), reflecting on the possible strengths and weaknesses of the deprivation of liberty safeguards, relating them and making specific reference to relevant experience from your own workplace. Note that this complements the work in the case study, and this critical reflective piece should focus more on the broader application to practice, rather than on a single case.
Note that as of April 2023 planned reforms and the introduction of the new liberty protection safeguards have been postponed “beyond the life of the current parliament”. You may wish to make reference to these plans but we have removed the requirement for this since the reforms as planned may well never the see the light of day
Possible strengths and weaknesses of the deprivation of liberty safeguards
Order Custom Written Essay Now
Assessment Criteria Case Study
Criteria
- Demonstrates the ability to keep appropriate records and to provide logical, reasoned arguments to support decisions and recommended courses of action
- Demonstrates the skills of evaluating and analysing complex evidence
- Demonstrates accurate applied knowledge of the legislation and codes of practice relating to mental capacity and to deprivation of liberty safeguards.
- Overall coherence of the completed task
- Demonstrates the ability to use and accurately reference relevant source material.
Assessment Criteria: Critical Reflection
- Demonstrates the ability to critically analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the deprivation of liberty safeguards regulations and code of practice
- Demonstrates the ability to learn from experience within own work/service setting.
- Demonstrates the ability to write clearly and concisely.
- Please ensure that you maintain confidentiality in your portfolio. To assist this
– Avoid mentioning the name of your agency
– Check all documents to ensure anonymity before copying and use the copies in your portfolio.
– If you have used correction fluids to cover any details, such documents should always be re- copied before submission
– Avoid using any real names or addresses. Age will be relevant but avoid dates of birth
Academic work at Masters Level should show good scholarship. This means that you should use source materials appropriately and accurately and reference them using academic methods. You will be given detailed guidance to the Harvard reference system should you require it.