Lessons from Affluenza, What makes for a happy life? A meaningful, fulfilling, existence?
Lessons from Affluenza, What makes for a happy life? A meaningful, fulfilling, existence?
Five to ten years from now, I expect to lead a meaningful life full of accomplishments in a household footprint of 5.2. While not so many people are passionate about their existence, I look forward to a passionate lifestyle, from the job, to vocation, to meeting friends and not forgetting family business. And because life flies like
And because life flies like wind, I will ensure all my time and energy is channeled in the right direction. I will find ways of living a meaningful life without necessarily indulging in a wasteful and Affluenza kind of life I will participate in creative practice of existence while expressing my soul and heart.
This is one of the main components of discovering the meaning and satisfaction in life. I will cautiously create things I have been yearning for. Nonetheless, I will not be creating a masterpiece but rather to express myself in an innovative manner and enjoy the immediate satisfaction derived by creating (Baumeister. 2013). While learning is a never ending process, I will not shy away from acquainting self with the need for sustainable existence. Again, I will resist any temptation to lead a lifestyle defined by society or popular culture and wasteful spending because that is not where happiness is derived, not from things but helping others.
Lessons from Affluenza, What makes for a happy life? A meaningful, fulfilling, existence?
Again, I will resist any temptation to lead a lifestyle defined by society or popular culture and wasteful spending because that is not where happiness is derived, instead it is culture that driven by greed and largesse. Learning is important for both personal growths as a prerequisite for internal satisfaction (Henderson & Lickerman, et al. 2000). Therefore, I will explore the world to increase my horizon while discovering issues that I never knew previously.
Sharing is a vital element that a person can experience in life. I will not only give away what I posses, but also give something of myself. I will share my views, knowledge, and passion for an ecofriendly environment with others to create an urgency that will ensure the environment welfare is safeguarded. I have realized that people prioritize their self-interest, while ignoring the pain of the other. As such, I will be ready to help individuals facing challenges in their lives. In any case, happiness is derived not from wasteful spending way of life but through helping others.
Lessons from Affluenza, What makes for a happy life? A meaningful, fulfilling, existence?
As such, I will be ready to help individuals facing challenges in their lives. In any case, happiness is derived not from wasteful spending way of life but through helping others. In this way I would be benefiting human soul and myself too. Travelling is a significantly enjoyable event (Boiller, 2013).
For that reason, I would travel to help forget about the past, enjoy my present lifestyle and learn about new prospects. Much as traveling is effective of letting go my ego and worries; I will travel so as to interact with my surrounding and connect with the world. I would also breathe deep and focus on the present to enjoy life to the fullest.
In addition, I will use breathing as the platform associated life with that in turn unites my thoughts as well as the body. And lastly, I will be grateful for everything that I have. I would appreciate each moment of my life regardless of the event happy or painful. I will also offer gratitude to all peoples that have had an impacted my life in many aspects.
Section 2: A smaller footprint. Now tell us about the nitty-gritty material circumstances of your life.
If the whole human population had a lifestyle like mine, we would require
5.2 hectars of earth. Also, we would require approximately twenty-three acres of land and twenty-two ton of carbon dioxide. Apart from these, there would be a need for 8% mobility; 34% services; 37% food; 12% food and 9% shelter. Personally, I believe that the most appropriate way to enhance my footprint in the world is a cleaning area, especially, clean body liquids that are washed downstream. I cannot imagine the level to which I can conserve the environment by reducing the use of body wash, shampoos, shaving creams among others.
Whereas human beings employ dangerous chemicals to clean our bodies, reducing their use will be imperative in ensuring environmental sustainability. Furthermore, I would minimize the consumption of processed foods. I consume too much-processed foods that are adverse not only to my body but the ecology as well.
Reducing the consumption of processed foods by about 50 percent would enhance my footprint while increasing my health. If I reduced the use of body cleaning chemicals as well as consumption of processed foods, my footprint would be
5.2 hectors of earth. Based on this footprint, it is clear that I exert physical pressure on the environment. Now I am aware that I need to change particular habits that I do on a regular basis to conserve the earth. In addition, significant dependence on processed foods and use of body cleaning liquids can adversely harm the environment. Therefore, If I could substitute processed foods with natural ones, it would lead to less use of land and resources could be utilized, increase the efficient as well as resource full routine.
Moreover, I could use 100 percent recycled products. By and large, I should begin using natural techniques in my life. It is of great importance to make some changes in my life; it is illogical to think that if everyone o would lead a lifestyle similar to mine, then it would take man earth to maintain such lifestyles. Above all, I will resist every temptation that appeals to Affluenza, which simply favors over procurement, overproduction, and overconsumption culture that culminates to massive wastes (Hamilton et al. 2006).
Section 3: An improved GPI and HPI, Explain how your envisioned life 5-10 years from now will help your country’s HPI and GPI. This should involve a clear explanation of what both of these indexes measure. Show that you read and understood the readings on these concepts.
By cutting down my consumption on virtually everything, I will still be live long, healthy and full of contentment within 5.2 hectors of earth ecological footprint. In a nutshell, I will augment the earth’s resources for future generations hence making earthly life sustainable (Hamilton, R et al. 2006). While the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) is an index that quantifies positive variables in human welfare such as life contentment, domestic cores and the benefits of volunteering, on the other hand, Happy Planet Index (HPI) is a benchmark that determines how competently a nation converts resources into human welfare (Henderson & Lickerman, et al. 2000).
In short, is measures societal progress outside the economic variable (Boiller, 2013). It contradicts with GDP which has been used to determine how a city or the entire planet is fairing on. The GDP has its limitations; it does not capture whether or not life is meaningful or ecological welfare. Again, it does determine stress levels, government’s trust, and social cohesion among others. When poverty rates plummets, the GPI increases in value, on the other hand, GDP increases in value when more factories are actively polluting the environment (Boiller, 2013). Ideally, GPI evaluates the vibrancy of a nation’s economy by including environmental and social variables that are never determined by GDP (Lawn, 2003).
References
Baumeister. R. (2013). The meanings of life https://aeon.co/essays/what-is-better-a-happy-life- or-a-meaningful-one
Boiller, D. (2013). Can the GPI –Genuine Progress Indicator — Supplant GDP? News and perspectives on the commons. Accessed on 21st March, 2016 at http://bollier.org/blog/can-gpi-genuine-progress-indicator-supplant-gdp
Lawn, P. A. (2003). A theoretical foundation to support the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and other related indexes. Ecological Economics 44(1): 105–119.
Hamilton, K., G. Ruta, et al. (2006). Where Is the Wealth of Nations? Measuring Capital for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Henderson, H., J. Lickerman, et al. (2000). Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators: A New Tool for Assessing National Trends. Bethesda, Maryland: Calvert Group.