Scientific evolution and Morality
Scientific evolution and Morality
Order 100% Plagiarism free essay now
Science is continuously rebuilding the natural world. This is not about the use of inventions for evil or good, but humans ofscientific period might face challenges in differentiating the moral and unethical goals. Moral purposes in a scientific organizationfocus on human, which makes science incapable of effectively using power whilemake people unable to perform science projects (Kaplan 138). From thebeginning science has not highlighted doing and understanding how to do. The element of what leads to any moral decision of doing good. This adversely affects scientific projects as scientists focus on doing what they know is ethical. They can get embryos and focus on making stem cells. However, from the conventional thought, this approach is not a proper justification form of destroying embryos to make stem cells. Nonetheless, it is a contentious issue. Science is able to access sources of life, which means that there isneed for moral purposes that have been overlooked by science.
Scientific evolution and Morality
Order 100% Plagiarism free essay now
And yet, this does not show that science is purely amoral. On the contrary, science can do good and it is the responsibility of humans to ensure scientific project comply with its initial moral goal (Kaplan 137). Since science faces the dilemma of ensuring its innovations are put to prudent use once they reach the market, it is upon society to remain cautious so that science does not make peopleto forget about moral meaning. This can be realized by recognizing science as an ethical activity, with clear moral goals.
Scientific evolution and Morality
Order 100% Plagiarism free essay now
Understanding science in this standpoint can help to evaluate the moral good and its significance as far as quality life and happiness are concerned. Regardless, under certain cases scientific research is related to higher moral acts (Pinker 65). The moral dilemma presented by modern science involves increasing moral good to relieve human conditions and being concerned about others. It is a dilemma to a person’s commitment to fairness, appreciating authority and wisdom. The moral dilemma of modern thought is not about technology used by scientists rather the attitude it presents. This is because technology can be used for evil as well as moral good, however, individuals in a technologically advanced era is the problem. Moreover, the dilemma of science is harmful to humans due to their attitudes and perceptions.